• Users Online: 448
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 10-14

Plasma visfatin level in adult Egyptians with android obesity

1 Department of Internal Medicine, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
2 Department of Clinical Pathology, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

Date of Submission29-Nov-2016
Date of Acceptance03-Dec-2016
Date of Web Publication27-Apr-2017

Correspondence Address:
Alaa M Wafa
Diabetes and Endocrine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/2356-8062.205207

Rights and Permissions

Android obesity is considered an important predictor of increased mortality and morbidity from diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disorders.
Our research was conducted to assess the level of serum visfatin in android obesity and its relation to anthropometric and biochemical parameters in adults with android obesity.
Patients and methods
This study was conducted on 136 patients recruited from the outpatient obesity clinic of Specialized Medical Hospital, Mansoura University. The patients were divided into two groups: group I consisted of 65 control nonobese individuals, and group II consisted of 71 obese individuals with android obesity. The obese patients were subdivided into obese diabetic patients (35 patients) and obese nondiabetic patients (36 patients). All participants were subjected to thorough history taking, full clinical examination, and anthropometric measurements to assess body mass index and waist circumference. The changes that appeared in the carbohydrate metabolism were interpreted according to the criteria from the glycometabolic classification of WHO. Plasma glucose levels, lipid profile, and serum visfatin were measured.
Our study demonstrated a significant elevation of visfatin (P≤0.001) in obese individuals (37.6; 20.7–65.9) compared with that in lean patients (15.3; 7.5–20). Additionally,visfatin levels were higher in the diabetic obese subgroup (45.5; 33.7–65.9) than in the nondiabetic obese subgroup (32; 20.7–46.5). Furthermore, visfatin was positively correlated to blood glucose in the obese group, which suggests a role of visfatin in glycemic control. A significant correlation between visfatin and lipid profile was demonstrated, which may suggest a role for visfatin in lipid homeostasis.
Serum visfatin was elevated in patients with android obesity, with more significant elevation in patients with android obesity with type 2 diabetes mellitus. It showed potential to be used as a marker of metabolic syndrome as it had a strong relation to android obesity.

Keywords: android obesity, diabetes mellitus, plasma visafatin

How to cite this article:
Wafa AM, Bakr AM, El Aal IA, Nagi AM. Plasma visfatin level in adult Egyptians with android obesity. Egypt J Obes Diabetes Endocrinol 2017;3:10-4

How to cite this URL:
Wafa AM, Bakr AM, El Aal IA, Nagi AM. Plasma visfatin level in adult Egyptians with android obesity. Egypt J Obes Diabetes Endocrinol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Sep 23];3:10-4. Available from: http://www.ejode.eg.net/text.asp?2017/3/1/10/205207

  Introduction Top

Obesity has been officially recognized as a disease by the American Medical Association, an action that could focus more effort by physicians and insurance companies to prevent or minimize its effects [1].

Android obesity has been associated with an increased risk for mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular disorders, metabolic syndrome (MS), diabetes mellitus, and some types of cancer [2]. Android obesity, defined as increased waist circumference (WC), is one of the components of metabolic abnormalities collectively called the MS. The latest definition of MS by the International Diabetes Federation has included android obesity as one of the essential components [3]. However, it is still unclear whether the visceral (intra-abdominal) or the subcutaneous component of abdominal fat is more harmful from the metabolic point of view. Elevated visceral adipose tissue (VAT), in particular, is associated with insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, systemic inflammation, diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality [4].

Adipocytokines are mainly adipocyte-derived cytokines regulating metabolism and are key regulators of insulin resistance. Several adipocytokines such as leptin and adiponectin affect immune and inflammatory functions. Visfatin has recently been identified as a new adipocytokine and corresponds to a protein identified previously as pre-B-cell colony-enhancing factor, a 52-kDa cytokine expressed in lymphocytes that bind to the insulin receptor affecting insulin resistance [5].

Numerous publications have reported various effects and correlations of visfatin with different medical conditions. In this way, increase in visfatin level can be observed in atherosclerosis, endothelial dysfunctions, MS, and renal insufficiency. The relationship with diabetes mellitus and visceral fat is controversial [6].

This adipokine has physiological influences on the control of glucose homeostasis through its insulin mimetic action; however, its association with obesity is not clearly established [7]. Another function of visfatin is the regulation of inflammatory and immunomodulating processes [5]. It was demonstrated that serum levels of visfatin were independently correlated withC-reactive protein and interleukin-6 in obese patients [8]. Molecular screening, epidemiological survey, and pharmacological studies have indicated that visfatin/Nampt may be an attractive diagnostic and drug target for cancer therapy [9].

So far, only a few studies have assessed visfatin in VAT and plasma visfatin concentrations in humans, and their results are divergent.

This study was proposed to assess serum visfatin level as well as its relation to select anthropometric and biochemical parameters in adults with android obesity.

  Patients and methods Top

This study was conducted on 136 patients who were divided into two groups. Group I included 65 healthy nonobese patients with BMI less than 25 kg/m2, and group II included 71 obese patients with android obesity with BMI greater than 30 kg/m2. All patients gave their formal consent. The protocol was approved the Ethical Committee of the Department of Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. The diagnosis of android obesity was made as per The International Diabetes Federation guidelines for WC cutoff points for Egyptians (80 cm for women and 94 cm for men). Group II was subdivided into 35 obese diabetic patients and 36 obese nondiabetic patients. All participants were recruited from the outpatient obesity clinic of Specialized Medical Hospital, Mansoura University. All of them underwent thorough history taking and clinical assessment using anthropometric examinations to assess body mass index and WC.

The changes that appeared in the carbohydrate metabolism were interpreted according to the criteria from the glycometabolic classification of WHO. The basal plasma glucose was determined through enzymatic method with glucose-6 phosphate. The normal values of plasma glucose were considered as values below 6.1 mmol/l. Plasma lipids were determined from a blood sample collected in the morning, after an overnight fast of a minimum 10 h. The total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol and triglycerides were determined through an enzymatic photometric method. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol was calculated by the Friederwald formula: LDL-cholesterol=Total cholesterol−HDL-cholesterol−(triglycerides/2.2).

We determined the ratios between total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol, the values over five being considered as indicating high atherogenic risk. The determination of visfatin was done from blood samples collected in the morning, in a fasting state, through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (R&D System), according to the reagents’ working protocol attached to the kit.

Statistical analysis

Data were statistically analyzed using the statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS, version 16; SPSS Inc.).

  1. Qualitative data were explained in numbers and percentages. The χ2-test was used for comparison between groups.
  2. Quantitative data were described as medians or means (SD), as appropriate.

They were tested for normality by means of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The independent sample t-test was used for normally distributed variables and the Mann–Whitney test for non-normally distributed variables in the comparison between groups.

  1. Odds ratios and their 95% confidence interval were calculated. P-values less than or equal to 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

  Results Top

This study was conducted on 71 obese individuals and 65 healthy controls.

  Discussion Top

In recent times, many research studies have been working on different types of obesity and have been searching for new markers or predictors for comorbidities of obesity. The aim of the present study was to assess serum visfatin level and its relation to some biochemical parameters and anthropometric measurements in adult android obesity. The study was conducted on 71 patients with android obesity and 65 healthy individuals matched for age and sex who served as the control group. All participants were subjected to full history taking, clinical examination, assessment of anthropometric parameters [body wieght, BMI, WC, and hip circumference (HC)], and biochemical assessment of lipid profile (serum total cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting blood glucose, random blood sugar). In addition, serum visfatin was assessed.

The present study included 51 (71.85%) women and 20 (28.2%) men ([Table 1]) as the majority of individuals attending the obesity clinic at Mansoura Internal Medicine Specialized Hospitals were female, which agrees with the finding of Patidar [10]. Other studies have shown different results [11].
Table 1 Comparison of demographic characters of the studied participants

Click here to view

In this study the group of individuals with android obesity had significantly higher serum visfatin levels compared with the control group (P≤0.001) ([Table 2] and [Figure 1]). This finding agrees with the data of Zahorska-Markiewicz [12]. In contrast, some research studies found no significant difference in visfatin levels between patients with android obesity and lean individuals [13]. The reasons for such conflicting findings may be related to different population characteristics such as age and sex, as well to ethnic heterogeneity, or other confounding factors like diabetes mellitus [14]. Another possible reason may be qualitative and quantitative discrepancies such as laboratory measurements obtained using different techniques [14]. Diabetes as a systemic disease is considered an inflammatory process, especially when the glycemic state is poor. Under these conditions the plasma visfatin levels are even higher [15]. Serum visfatin may be a promising predictor for diabetes mellitus and insulin-resistant state in individuals with obesity [16].
Table 2 Comparison of serum visfatin level, lipid profile, blood sugar level, and anthropometric measurements among obese patients and controls

Click here to view
Figure 1 Comparison of serum visfatin between cases (orange) and controls (green).

Click here to view

Our study demonstrated that serum visfatin was significantly higher in obese diabetic patients than in obese patients without diabetes (P≤0.001) ([Table 3]). This result was in agreement with those of Palin et al. [17]. In contrast, Taşkesen et al. [18] demonstrated no significant difference.
Table 3 Comparison of serum visfatin level between obese diabetic versus obese nondiabetic of the studied patients

Click here to view

Regarding the anthropometric parameters, our study demonstrated that BMI, WC, and HC were significantly higher in obese patients when compared with the control group (P≤0.001, P≤0.001, and P=0.004, respectively) ([Table 2] and [Figure 2]).
Figure 2 Comparison between BMI (blue), weight (red), and height (green).

Click here to view

Our study demonstrated that there was a significant positive correlation between serum visfatin level and anthropometric parameters such as BMI (P=0.015) and WC (P=0.014) in obese patients. Additionally, the data obtained in the present study demonstrated a significant positive correlation between serum visfatin and HC (P=0.001) ([Table 4]). These results might suggest that elevated serum visfatin levels that were detected in these individuals are determined by the subcutaneous adipose tissue located in the thighs and buttocks rather than by the VAT [19].
Table 4 Correlations between serum visfatin level and anthropometric measures, blood sugar level, and lipid profile among obese patients

Click here to view

In contrast Ersoy et al. [20] found no correlation between serum visfatin serum level and different anthropometric parameters.

In our study, fasting blood glucose levels and random blood glucose were significantly higher in obese patients compared with the control group (P<0.0001 and <0.0001, respectively). In addition there was a significant positive correlation between serum visfatin level and fasting blood glucose (P=0.01) and random blood glucose (P=0.01) ([Table 4]). These findings were in agreement with those of Legakis et al. [21]. Other investigators suggested that serum visfatin levels might compensate for the impairment of insulin, whereas others found no relation [22]. Furthermore, combined components of MS, as central obesity with either insulin resistance or hyperinsulinemia, were associated with higher circulating serum visfatin levels [23].

Regarding the serum lipid profile, our study demonstrated that there were higher levels of serum cholesterol level, serum triglycerides, and serum LDL in obese patients than in control lean patients (P≤0.001, ≤0.001, and ≤0.001, respectively) ([Table 2]).

In addition, our study revealed a significant positive correlation between visfatin serum levels and different parameters of lipid profile such as serum cholesterol and serum LDL (P=0.05 and 0.015, respectively) and no significant correlation with serum HDL (P=0.629) ([Table 4]). These findings were in agreement with the findings of De Luis et al. [22], who reported the association between cholesterol-related profile and visfatin level in female patients. Another study by Catalán et al. [24] reported a positive association between circulating visfatin and triglycerides and total cholesterol, suggesting a role of visfatin in lipid homeostasis, which, according to the authors, remains to be further investigated. Although the connection between serum visfatin and lipid profile may be through nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) metabolism given its extracellular and intracellular NAD biosynthetic properties, nicotinic acid increases HDL-cholesterol and reduces triglyceride-rich lipoproteins [15]. Different results were demonstrated by Zahorska-Markiewicz [12], as they found no relation between visfatin and lipid profile parameters.

The conflicting data regarding the relation of visfatin to lipid profile was suggested to be due to different recruitment criteria in previous studies or confounding factors such as sex, age, lifestyle, duration of diabetes, and degree of obesity that may affect visfatin concentrations [22].

  Conclusion Top

From our study, it could be concluded that serum visfatin was elevated in obese individuals with android obesity with more elevation in type 2 diabetes mellitus, which may support the hypothesis that serum visfatin may be associated with impaired glucose metabolism. Moreover, the high sensitivity and specificity of visfatin that predicts MS suggests its pathophysiological role, which might be useful in therapeutic intervention in future.

Limitations of the study

The first limitation of our study is the small number of patients. The second limitation is that we conducted our study in one center, the internal medicine hospital (diabetes clinic and diabetes inpatient department), Mansoura University. The reason for these limitations are the high cost associated with including large numbers of patients and conducting the study in different centers.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2013; 38:S4–S36.  Back to cited text no. 1
Martin SA, Haren MT, Taylor AW et al. Chronic disease prevalence and associations in a cohort of Australian men: the Florey Adelaide Male Ageing Study (FAMAS). BMC Public Health 2008; 8:261.  Back to cited text no. 2
Alberti KGM, Zimmet P, Shaw J. The metabolic syndrome new worldwide definition. Lancet 2005; 366:1059–1062.  Back to cited text no. 3
Demerath EW, Reed D, Rogers N et al. Visceral adiposity and its anatomical distribution as predictors of the metabolic syndrome and cardiometabolic risk factor levels. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 8:1263–1271.  Back to cited text no. 4
Moschen AR, Kaser A, Enrich B et al. Visfatin, an adipocytokine with proinflammatory and immunomodulating properties. J Immunol 2007; 178:1748–1758.  Back to cited text no. 5
Gligor R, Zdremtan D, Pilat L et al. Correlation of visfatin with the lipidic metabolism in diabetic and obese patients. Proc Rom Acad 2012; 1:37–43.  Back to cited text no. 6
Fukuhara A, Matsuda M, Nishizawa M et al. Visfatin a protein secreted by visceral fat that mimics the effects of insulin. Science 2005; 307:426–430.  Back to cited text no. 7
Sommer G, Garten A, Petzold S et al. Visfatin/PBEF/Nampt: structure, regulation and potential function of a novel adipokine. Clin Sci (Lond) 2008; 115:13–23.  Back to cited text no. 8
Zhang LQ, Heruth DP, Ye SQ. Jan nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase in human diseases. J Bioanal Biomed 2011; 3:13–25.  Back to cited text no. 9
Patidar OP. Higher prevalence rate of CHD in ‘apple type of obesity’ cases as compared to ‘pear type obesity’ cases. Indian J Clin Pract 2013; 23:791–794.  Back to cited text no. 10
Díaz ME, Jiménez S, García RG et al. Overweight, obesity, central adiposity and associated chronic diseases in Cuban adults. MEDICC Rev 2009; 11:23–28.  Back to cited text no. 11
Zahorska-Markiewicz B. Serum concentration of visfatin in obese women. Metabolism 2007; 56:1131–1134.  Back to cited text no. 12
Hofsr D, Ueland T, Hager H et al. Inflammatory mediators in morbidly obese subjects; associations with glucose abnormalities and changes after oral glucose. Eur J Endocrinol 2009; 161:451–458.  Back to cited text no. 13
Jin H, Jiang B, Tang J et al. Serum visfatin concentrations in obese adolescentsand its correlation with age and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2008; 79:412–418.  Back to cited text no. 14
Wang WD, Xing L, Teng JR et al. Effects of basal insulin application on serum visfatin and adiponectin levels in type 2 diabetes. Exp Ther Med 2015; 9:2219–2224.  Back to cited text no. 15
Chang Y, Chang T, Lee W, Chuang L. The relationship of visfatin/pre-B-cell colony-enhancing factor/nicotinamidephosphoribosyltransferase in adipose tissue with inflammation, insulin resistance, and plasma lipids. Metab Clin Exp 2010; 59:93.  Back to cited text no. 16
Palin MF, Labrecque B, Beaudry D, Mayhue M et al. Visfatin expression is not associated with adipose tissue abundance in the porcine model. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2008; 35:58–73.  Back to cited text no. 17
Taşkesen D, Kirel B, Us T. Serum visfatin levels, adiposity, and glucose metabolism in obese adolescents. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 2012; 4:76–81.  Back to cited text no. 18
Kamińska A, Kopczyńska E, Bronisz A et al. An evaluation of visfatin levels in obese subjects. Endokrynol Pol 2010; 61:169–173.  Back to cited text no. 19
Ersoy C, Sadikoglu G, Orhan H et al. Body fat distribution has no effect on serum visfatin levels in healthy female subjects. Cytokine 2010; 49:275–278.  Back to cited text no. 20
Legakis I, Mantzouridis T, Bouboulis G et al. Reciprocal changes of serum adispin and visfatin levels in patients with type2 diabetes after an overnight fast. Arch Endocrinol Metab 2016; 60:76–78.  Back to cited text no. 21
De Luis DA, Gonzalez Sagrado M, Conde R et al. Effect of a hypocaloric diet on serum visfatin in obese non-diabetic patients. Nutrition 2008; 24:517–521.  Back to cited text no. 22
Krzystek-Korpacka M, Patryn E, Bednarz-Misa I et al. Visfatin in juvenile obesity − the effect of obesity intervention and sex. Eur J Clin Invest 2011; 41:1284–1291.  Back to cited text no. 23
Catalán V, Gómez-Ambrosi J, Rodríguez A et al. Up-regulation of the novel proinflammatory adipokines lipocalin-2, chitinase-3 like-1 and osteopontin as well as angiogenic-related factors in visceral adipose tissue of patients with colon cancer. J Nutr Biochem 2011; 22:634–641.  Back to cited text no. 24


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]

This article has been cited by
1 Serum visfatin as predictive marker of cardiometabolic risk in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Nearmeen M. Rashad,M.N. Ayman Abd-Elrahman,Amal S. El-Shal,Abdelaziz I. Amin
Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  In this article
Patients and methods
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded43    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal